An analysis of the tension between the traditionalists and the modernists in the 1920s

Most of these people were modernists. The Prohibition experiment was one of the many conflicts the two cultures had. Modernists believed that God was a good guy and the universe was a place for fun, while the fundamentalists stuck to old time believes. She would eventually resign as a Presbyterian missionary in May.

It seemed to many observers that the licensing of Van Dusen and Lehman was likely to cause a split in the church. On December 31,Henry van Dyke publicly relinquished his pew at First Presbyterian Church, Princeton as a protest against Machen's fundamentalist preaching.

It can easily be seen that leisure was becoming an important part of American life, especially in the heterosocial sense. Bootleggers found ways to sneak liquor past officials and making massive sums of money, all outside the boundaries of the law.

Coffin and the liberals were prepared to walk out of the Assembly and take their churches out of the denomination rather than submit to the further "Bryanizing of the Presbyterian Church. Although immigration was being regulated, the supporters of a traditional society found the immigrants to be threatening their traditional way of life.

The new society and all it's conflict created issues for the Democratic party, as their party was very diverse, with some of their members accepting of the new society and others not.

When does it become immoral and unacceptable if no one disagrees? In the new culture, things were changing so quickly.

Before he could accept or refuse, however, General Assembly intervened, and in the General Assembly, moderates succeeded in securing a committee to study how to reconcile the two parties at Princeton.

It was a differen…t point of view for everybody and if you didnt join what someone thought that you should join then they basically thought you were an idiot.

Traditionalists And Modernists In 1920s Term paper

Following the war, they worked hard to build on this legacy of unity. Fundamentalists, on the other hand, were cast as intolerant conservatives who refused to deal with these new discoveries and had arbitrarily drawn the line as to what was off limits in religious discussion.

Fundamentalist–Modernist controversy

No charges were brought. Log in or register now. The committee that had brought the charges then appealed to the General Assembly, held in Portland, Oregon. Whereas previously, Higher Criticism had seemed a fairly technical, scholarly issue, Briggs now spelt out its full implications.

Their emphasis was more on the authority of scripture and a conversion experience, rather than on the Westminster Confession. The fundamentalists won a small victory, but soon Christians began combining science with religion and accepting the new discoveries of science.

Several states had responded to Bryan's call, including Tennesseewhich passed such a law in March Many also had fears which caused the rise of the "Klan. It was the question of what to do about Harry Emerson Fosdick and his provocative sermon of the previous year.

The KKK opposed people of color and immigrants. Modernists wanted to adapt religion to the modern society while the fundamentalist believed that religious teaching should be taken literally and not changed.

The majority report of the Standing Committee of Foreign Missions affirmed the church's adherence to the Westminster Confession ; expressed its confidence that Speer and the Board shared this conviction; and repudiated Re-Thinking Missions.

Many people, Fosdick argued, simply found it impossible to accept the virgin birth of Christ, the doctrine of substitutionary atonementor the literal Second Coming of Christ in the light of modern science.

These mafia members were able to make tons of money off of this prohibition idea. Meaning "force or firmness of truth, Mohandas Gandhi worked and lived by this word.

In the s there was a large increase in city population as more and more people were attracted and came to the cities.

However, society only proved to be more accepting and modern as time went on. This modernist movement was spearheaded by the growing independence, liberation, and celebration of youth during this period.

Religions also brought in conflicts.-a period in the s when African-American achievements in art and music and literature flourisheds-United States (Harlem)-Helped give a new dynamic to race relations in the U.S.

Clashing between modernists and traditionalists as modernists support African American equality. In both cases the traditionalists and the modernists were at odds. The first example of the tension between the traditionalists and the modernists was the unfriendly fire from the fundamentalists on the new science and progressive education in the s.

Modernists thought that prohibition was just another way the government could control their morality and they found many ways to obtain it And with the 21st amendment, prohibition was repealed Modernists vs. Traditionalists in the s.

The 's were a time of great change in the United States of America.

Fundamentalist–Modernist controversy

New ideas of how things should work socially, politically, and economically. -Fundamentalists, Modernists, Bryan, Scopes, Darrow -court case with Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan debating the issue of teaching evolution in public schools.

Traditionalists v. ModernistsTennessee-Scopes was only fined. Tension between traditionalists and modernists only increased with this.

Newly established ideas and institutions such as mass advertisement and organized crime were a manifestation of the conflict between modern and traditional ideas, as well as the cause for much tension between the two opposing sides of the issue.

An analysis of the tension between the traditionalists and the modernists in the 1920s
Rated 5/5 based on 9 review